This paper analyzes the optimal control of the full time-dependent Maxwell equations. Our goal is to find an optimal current density and its time-dependent amplitude which steer the electric and magnetic fields to the desired ones. The main difficulty of the optimal control problem arises from the complexity of the Maxwell equations, featuring a first-order hyperbolic structure. We present a rigorous mathematical analysis for the optimal control problem. Here, the semigroup theory and the Helmholtz decomposition theory are the key tools in the analysis. Our theoretical findings include existence, strong regularity, and KKT theory. The corresponding optimality system consists of forward-backward Maxwell equations for the optimal electromagnetic and adjoint fields, magnetostatic saddle point equations for the optimal current density, and a projection formula for the optimal time-dependent amplitude. A semismooth Newton algorithm in a function space is established for solving the nonlinear and nonsmooth optimality system. The paper is concluded by numerical results, where mixed finite elements and Crank–Nicholson schema are used.
DOI : 10.1051/m2an/2015041
Mots-clés : Optimal control, time-dependent Maxwell’s equations, strongly continuous semigroup, Helmholtz decomposition, semismooth Newton
@article{M2AN_2016__50_1_237_0, author = {Bommer, Vera and Yousept, Irwin}, title = {Optimal control of the full time-dependent maxwell equations}, journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis }, pages = {237--261}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {50}, number = {1}, year = {2016}, doi = {10.1051/m2an/2015041}, zbl = {1379.78005}, mrnumber = {3460108}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2015041/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Bommer, Vera AU - Yousept, Irwin TI - Optimal control of the full time-dependent maxwell equations JO - ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis PY - 2016 SP - 237 EP - 261 VL - 50 IS - 1 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2015041/ DO - 10.1051/m2an/2015041 LA - en ID - M2AN_2016__50_1_237_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Bommer, Vera %A Yousept, Irwin %T Optimal control of the full time-dependent maxwell equations %J ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis %D 2016 %P 237-261 %V 50 %N 1 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2015041/ %R 10.1051/m2an/2015041 %G en %F M2AN_2016__50_1_237_0
Bommer, Vera; Yousept, Irwin. Optimal control of the full time-dependent maxwell equations. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , Tome 50 (2016) no. 1, pp. 237-261. doi : 10.1051/m2an/2015041. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2015041/
A. Alonso and A. Valli, Eddy Current Approximation of Maxwell Equations: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Springer (2010). | MR | Zbl
Vector potentials in three-dimensional non-smooth domains. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 21 (1998) 823–864. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,On the existence, uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from Lagrangian multipliers. Rev. Française Automat. Informat. Recherche Opérationnelle Sér. Rouge 8 (1974) 129–151. | Numdam | MR | Zbl
,Fully discrete finite element approaches for time-dependent Maxwell’s equations. Numer. Math. 82 (1999) 193–219. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, Jr. and ,A remark on the regularity of solutions of Maxwell’s equations on Lipschitz domains. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 12 (1990) 365–368. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Singularities of electromagnetic fields in polyhedral domains. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 151 2000 221–276. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,Singularities of Maxwell interface problems. ESAIM: M2AN 33 (1999) 627–649. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
, and ,Optimal control of three-dimensional state-constrained induction heating problems with nonlocal radiation effects. SIAM J. Control Optim. 49 (2011) 1707–1736. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , , and ,V. Girault and P. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986). | MR | Zbl
The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth Newton method. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2003) 865–888. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,Shape sensitivities for an inverse problem in magnetic induction tomography based on the eddy current model. Inverse Problems 31 (2015) 065006. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, ,Adaptive edge element approximation ofH(curl)-elliptic optimal control problems with control constraints. BIT 55 (2015) 255–277. | DOI | MR
and ,A robust preconditioned minres solver for distributed time-periodic eddy current optimal control problems. SIAM J. Scientific Comput. 34 (2012) B785–B809. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,M. Kolmbauer and U. Langer, Efficient solvers for some classes of time-periodic eddy current optimal control problems. In vol. 45 of Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Algorithms, and Their Applications, edited by O.P. Iliev, S.D. Margenov, P.D Minev, P.S. Vassilevski and L.T Zikatanov. Springer New York (2013) 203–216. | MR | Zbl
Time domain decomposition in final value optimal control of the Maxwell system. A tribute to J.L. Lions. ESAIM: COCV 8 (2002) 775–799. | Numdam | MR | Zbl
and ,R. Leis, Initial-boundary value problems in mathematical physics. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (1986). | MR | Zbl
A. Logg, K.-A. Mardal, and G.N. Wells, Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method. Springer, Boston (2012). | Zbl
An analysis of a mixed method for approximating Maxwell’s equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28 (1991) 1610–1634. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,P. Monk, Finite element methods for Maxwell’s equations. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2003). | MR | Zbl
Mixed finite elements in . Numer. Math. 35 (1980) 315–341. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,On two optimal control problems for magnetic fields. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 14 (2014) 555–573. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,Optimal control of magnetic fields in flow measurement. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Systems 8 (2015) 579–605. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,A. Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, New York (1983). | MR | Zbl
On the boundary value problems of electro- and magnetostatics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, Sect. A Math. 92 (1982) 165–174. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,F. Tröltzsch, Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 112 of Grad. Stud. Math. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2010). | MR | Zbl
PDE-constrained optimization of time-dependent 3D electromagnetic induction heating by alternating voltages. ESAIM: M2AN 46 (2012) 709–729. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
and ,Semismooth Newton methods for operator equations in function spaces. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2003) 805–842. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Maxwell’s boundary value problem on Riemannian manifolds with nonsmooth boundaries. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 46 (1974) 410–437. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Exact boundary controllability of a Maxwell problem. SIAM J. Control Optim. 38 (2000) 736–750. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Optimal bilinear control of eddy current equations with grad-div regularization. J. Numer. Math. 23 (2015) 81–98. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Optimal control of a nonlinear coupled electromagnetic induction heating system with pointwise state constraints. Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Math. Appl. 2 (2010) 45–77. | MR | Zbl
,Finite element analysis of an optimal control problem in the coefficients of time-harmonic Eddy current equations. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 154 (2012) 879–903. | DOI | MR | Zbl
.Optimal control of Maxwell’s equations with regularized state constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 52 (2012) 559–581. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Optimal control of quasilinear -elliptic partial differential equations in magnetostatic field problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51 (2013) 3624–3651. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Cité par Sources :