Incommensurability and laboratory science

Trizio, Emiliano

Philosophia Scientiae, Tome 8 (2004) no. 1, pp. 235-267.

Le but de l'article est d'établir des relations entre, d'une part, la caractérisation générale kuhnienne de l'incommensurabilité comme impossibilité de traduire l'une dans l'autre les taxinomies de théories scientifiques rivales et, d'autre part, la version plus spécifique de l'incommensurabilité proposée par Hacking, laquelle porte sur des théories concurrentes s'étant stabilisées en relation à des équipements de laboratoire et des techniques de mesure différents. Sur la base d'une analyse, inspirée des travaux de Duhem, de la nature des taxinomies scientifiques, on soutiendra que l'approche linguistique kuhnienne est inadéquate pour rendre compte de la manière dont les termes scientifiques s'appliquent à la nature dans le domaine des sciences de laboratoire, au sein desquelles le rôle des opérations de mesure est essentiel. L'analyse introduira la notion de taxinomie duale et celle de caractère ostensif d'une théorie. Il apparaîtra que, une fois ces deux notions prises en compte, il devient possible de poser les bases d'une version taxinomique élargie de l'incommensurabilité, susceptible de fournir un cadre commun pour la discussion des exemples introduits par Kuhn et Hacking.

The aim of the article is to establish relations between Kuhn's general characterization of incommensurability as the impossibility to translate the taxonomies pertaining to rival scientific theories into one another and Hacking's more specific version of incommensurability affecting competing theories that have stabilized relatively to different laboratory equipments and measurement techniques. On the basis of an analysis of the nature of scientific taxonomies that takes its inspiration from the works of Duhem, it will be argued that Kuhn's language-based approach is inadequate to provide an account of the way scientific terms apply to nature in the domain of physical laboratory science, in which the role of measurement procedures is essential. The analysis will be carried out by introducing the notion of dual taxonomy and the notion of ostensive character of a theory. It will result that, once these two notions are taken into account, it becomes possible to lay the foundations of an enlarged taxonomic version of incommensurability which can provide a common framework for the discussion of the examples introduced by Kuhn and Hacking.

[1] S. Allén (editor) 1989.- Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1983: PSA 1982: Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, | MR

[2] Carnap, Rudolf 1963.- Intellectual Autobiography, in P. A. Schilpp (editor), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Lasalle, IL: Open Court.

[3] Cartwright, Nancy 1993.- How We Relate Theory to Observation

[4] Cassirer, Ernst 1910.- Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlag.

[5] Duhem, Pierre 1906.- La théorie Physique : son objet, sa structure, Paris : Vrin. English translation by P. P. Wiener, 1991, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. | MR | Zbl

[6] Fine A., Forbes M. and Wessels L. (editors) 1991.- PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, volume 2, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.

[7] Hacking, Ian 1983.- Representing and intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[8] Hacking, Ian 1992.- The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences

[9] Hacking, Ian 1993.- Working in a New World: The Taxonomic Solution

[10] Hacking, Ian 2003.- L'importance de la classification chez le dernier Kuhn, Archives de Philosophie, 66(3) : 389-402.

[11] Hiley D., Bohman J. and Shusterman R. (editors) 1991.- The Interpretative Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

[12] Horwich, Paul (editor) 1993.- World Changes, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. | MR

[13] Hoyningen-Huene, Paul 1989.- Die Wissenschaftsphilosophie Thomas S. Kuhns: Rekonstruktion und Grundlagenprobleme. Braunschweig: Vieweg. English translation by A. T. Levine, 1993, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of the English edition.

[14] Husserl, Edmund 1992.- Logische Untersuchungen, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

[15] Kuhn, Thomas 1961.- The function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science, Isis 52: 161-193. Reprinted in [Kuhn 1977, 178-224$]$. The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book.

[16] Kuhn, Thomas 1970a.- Reflections on My Critics

[17] Kuhn, Thomas 1970b.- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

[18] Kuhn, Thomas 1974.- Second Thoughts on Paradigms, in F. Suppe, ed., The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 459-482. Reprinted in [Kuhn 1977, 293-319$]$. The pages mentioned in the paper are the ones of this last book. | MR

[19] Kuhn, Thomas 1977.- The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[20] Kuhn, Thomas 1983.- Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability | MR

[21] Kuhn, Thomas 1989.- Possible Worlds in History of Science

[22] Kuhn, Thomas 1991a.- The Road since Structure

[23] Kuhn, Thomas 1991b.- The Natural and the Human Sciences

[24] Kuhn, Thomas 1993.- Afterwords

[25] Kuhn, Thomas 2000.- The Road Since Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[26] Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave allan (editors) 1970.- Criticism and Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965, volume 4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | MR

[27] Parrini, Paolo 2002.- L'empirismo logico, Roma: Carocci editore.

[28] Pickering, Andrew 1984.- Constructing Quarks, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

[29] Pickering, Andrew 1995.- The Mangle of Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | Zbl

[30] Pickering, Andrew (editor) 1992.- Science as practice and culture, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

[31] Soler, Léna 2003.- De la commune mesure phénoménale entre théories physiques dites incommensurables, Philosophia Scientiae, 7(2) : 239-265.

[32] Suppe F. (editor) 1974.- The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana: University of Illinois Press. | MR