no. 4
Reply to comments on « The modern hypothesis testing hybrid : R.A. Fisher's fading influence »
Journal de la Société française de statistique, Tome 145 (2004) no. 4, pp. 65-68.
complète Discussion de l'article de D. Denis « Sur les tests d'hypothèse : la véritable nature d'une méthodologie hybride »
complète Remarques sur l'article de D. Denis
complète Comments on D. Denis « Grappling with Fisher's legacy in social science hypothesis testing : some comments on Denis »
complète Discussion and comments : strong versus weak significance tests and the role of meta-analytic procedures
complète Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty
complète Discussion of D. Denis 
@article{JSFS_2004__145_4_65_0,
     author = {Denis, Daniel J.},
     title = {Reply to comments on {\guillemotleft} {The} modern hypothesis testing hybrid : {R.A.} {Fisher's} fading influence {\guillemotright}},
     journal = {Journal de la Soci\'et\'e fran\c{c}aise de statistique},
     pages = {65--68},
     publisher = {Soci\'et\'e fran\c{c}aise de statistique},
     volume = {145},
     number = {4},
     year = {2004},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_65_0/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Denis, Daniel J.
TI  - Reply to comments on « The modern hypothesis testing hybrid : R.A. Fisher's fading influence »
JO  - Journal de la Société française de statistique
PY  - 2004
SP  - 65
EP  - 68
VL  - 145
IS  - 4
PB  - Société française de statistique
UR  - http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_65_0/
LA  - en
ID  - JSFS_2004__145_4_65_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Denis, Daniel J.
%T Reply to comments on « The modern hypothesis testing hybrid : R.A. Fisher's fading influence »
%J Journal de la Société française de statistique
%D 2004
%P 65-68
%V 145
%N 4
%I Société française de statistique
%U http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_65_0/
%G en
%F JSFS_2004__145_4_65_0
Denis, Daniel J. Reply to comments on « The modern hypothesis testing hybrid : R.A. Fisher's fading influence ». Journal de la Société française de statistique, Tome 145 (2004) no. 4, pp. 65-68. http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_65_0/

Bakan D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.

Bolles R. C. (1962). The difference between statistical hypotheses and scientific hypotheses. Psychological Reports, 11, 639-645.

Cohen J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.

Denis D. (2001). Inferring the alternative hypothesis: Risky business. Theory & Science, 2, 1. http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol002.001/03denis.html. Also available on-line (http://htpprints.yorku.ca/).

Fisher R. A. (1966). The design of experiments. New York: Hafner Publishing Company. | JFM

Gill J. (2002). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach. Chapman & Hall/CRC. New York. | Zbl

Macdonald R. R. (1997). On statistical testing in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 333-347. http://www.stir.ac.uk/staff/psychology/rrm1/STATR7.html