We investigate a distributed optimal control problem for a diffuse interface model for tumor growth. The model consists of a Cahn–Hilliard type equation for the phase field variable, a reaction diffusion equation for the nutrient concentration and a Brinkman type equation for the velocity field. These PDEs are endowed with homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions for the phase field variable, the chemical potential and the nutrient as well as a “no-friction” boundary condition for the velocity. The control represents a medication by cytotoxic drugs and enters the phase field equation. The aim is to minimize a cost functional of standard tracking type that is designed to track the phase field variable during the time evolution and at some fixed final time. We show that our model satisfies the basics for calculus of variations and we present first-order and second-order conditions for local optimality. Moreover, we present a globality condition for critical controls and we show that the optimal control is unique on small time intervals.
Mots-clés : Optimal control with PDEs, calculus of variations, tumor growth, Cahn–Hilliard equation, Brinkman equation, first-order necessary optimality conditions, second-order sufficient optimality conditions, uniqueness of globally optimal solutions
@article{COCV_2020__26_1_A71_0, author = {Ebenbeck, Matthias and Knopf, Patrik}, title = {Optimal control theory and advanced optimality conditions for a diffuse interface model of tumor growth}, journal = {ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {26}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1051/cocv/2019059}, mrnumber = {4155227}, zbl = {1451.35233}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019059/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Ebenbeck, Matthias AU - Knopf, Patrik TI - Optimal control theory and advanced optimality conditions for a diffuse interface model of tumor growth JO - ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations PY - 2020 VL - 26 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019059/ DO - 10.1051/cocv/2019059 LA - en ID - COCV_2020__26_1_A71_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Ebenbeck, Matthias %A Knopf, Patrik %T Optimal control theory and advanced optimality conditions for a diffuse interface model of tumor growth %J ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations %D 2020 %V 26 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019059/ %R 10.1051/cocv/2019059 %G en %F COCV_2020__26_1_A71_0
Ebenbeck, Matthias; Knopf, Patrik. Optimal control theory and advanced optimality conditions for a diffuse interface model of tumor growth. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, Tome 26 (2020), article no. 71. doi : 10.1051/cocv/2019059. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019059/
[1] A computational framework for the personalized clinical treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Special Issue: Mathematical and Computational Modeling in Biomechanics. ZAMM – J. Appl. Math. Mech. 98 (2018) 2307–2327. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , , and ,[2] Global minima for semilinear optimal control problems. Comput. Optim. Appl. 65 (2016) 261–288. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[3] Global minima for optimal control of the obstacle problem. ESAIM: COCV 26 (2020) 64. | Numdam | MR | Zbl
, and ,[4] Multiparameter computational modeling of tumor invasion. Cancer Res. 69 (2009) 4493–4501. | DOI
, , , , , , , and ,[5] Optimization of cytostatic leukemia therapy in an advection–reaction–diffusion model. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 167 (2015) 296–325. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[6] Pontryagin’s maximum principle for optimal control of the nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes systems in two dimensions. Preprint (2018). | arXiv
, and ,[7] The Cahn–Hilliard gradient theory for phase separation with nonsmooth free energy. I. Mathematical analysis. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 2 (1991) 233–280. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[8] Free boundary value problems associated with the growth and development of multicellular spheroids. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 8 (1997) 639–658. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[9] Sufficient second-order optimality conditions for semilinear control problems with pointwise state constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 19 (2008) 616–643. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[10] Long-time dynamics and optimal control of a diffuse interface model for tumor growth. To appear in: Appl. Math. Optim. (2019). | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[11] Avascular growth, angiogenesis and vascular growth in solid tumours: the mathematical modelling of the stages of tumour development. Math. Comput. Model. 23 (1996) 47–87. | DOI | Zbl
,[12] Optimal boundary control of a viscous Cahn–Hilliard system with dynamic boundary condition and double obstacle potentials. SIAM J. Control Optim. 53 (2015) 2696–2721. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[13] Optimal distributed control of a diffuse interface model of tumor growth. Nonlinearity 30 (2017) 2518–2546. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[14] Optimal velocity control of a viscous Cahn–Hilliard system with convection and dynamic boundary conditions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56 (2018) 1665–1691. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[15] Nonlinear simulations of solid tumor growth using a mixture model: invasion and branching. J. Math. Biol. 58 (2009) 723–763. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[16] Analysis of a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman model for tumour growth with chemotaxis. J. Differ. Equ. 266 (2018) 5998–6036. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[17] On a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman model for tumor growth and its singular limits. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51 (2019) 1868–1912. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[18] Optimal medication for tumors modeled by a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman equation. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 58 (2019) 131. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[19] Interactions between a uniformly proliferating tumour and its surroundings: uniform material properties. Math. Med. Biol. 20 (2003) 47–89. | DOI | Zbl
and ,[20] Interactions between a uniformly proliferating tumour and its surroundings: stability analysis for variable material properties. Int. J. Engrg. Sci. 47 (2009) 1182–1192. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[21] Computer simulation of glioma growth and morphology. NeuroImage 37 (2007) 59–70. | DOI
, , , , , and ,[22] A free boundary problem for a coupled system of elliptic, hyperbolic, and Stokes equations modeling tumor growth. Interfaces Free Bound. 8 (2006) 247–261. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[23] On a diffuse interface model of tumour growth. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 26 (2015) 215–243. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[24] Optimal distributed control of a nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard/Navier–Stokes system in two dimensions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 54 (2016) 221–250. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[25] Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer, New York (1993). | DOI
,[26] Well-posedness of a Cahn-Hilliard system modelling tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 28 (2017) 284–316. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[27] Optimal control of treatment time in a diffuse interface model of tumor growth. Appl. Math. Optim. 78 (2018) 495–544. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[28] A multiphase Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy model for tumour growth with necrosis. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 28 (2018) 525–577. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[29] A Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy model for tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 26 (2016) 1095–1148. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[30] Cahn–Hilliard inpainting with double obstacle potential. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 11 (2018) 2064–2089. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[31] Asymptotic limits and optimal control for the Cahn–Hilliard system with convection and dynamic boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 178 (2019) 1–31. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[32] On the growth and stability of cell cultures and solid tumors. J. Theoret. Biol. 56 (1976) 229–242. | DOI | MR
,[33] Numerical simulation of a thermodynamically consistent four-species tumor growth model. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 28 (2012) 3–24. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[34] K.G. Van Der Zee, Formal asymptotic limit of a diffuse-interface tumor-growth model. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25 (2015) 1011–1043. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and[35] Distributed optimal control of the Cahn–Hilliard system including the case of a double-obstacle homogeneous free energy density. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012) 388–418. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[36] Parameter identification via optimal control for a Cahn–Hilliard-Chemotaxis system with a variable mobility. Appl. Math. Optim. (2018). | MR | Zbl
and ,[37] Optimal control of a Vlasov–Poisson plasma by an external magnetic field. Calc. Var. 57 (2018). | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[38] Optimal control of a Vlasov–Poisson plasma by fixed magnetic field coils. Appl. Math. Optim. 81 (2020) 961–988. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[39] Multi-input optimal control problems for combined tumor anti-angiogenic and radiotherapy treatments. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 153 (2012) 195–224. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[40] General diffuse-interface theories and an approach to predictive tumor growth modeling. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20 (2010) 477–517. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[41] Optimal control analysis of a mathematical model for breast cancer. Math. Comput. Appl. 23 (2018). | MR
, and ,[42] Incompressible limit of a mechanical model of tumour growth with viscosity. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 373 (2015) 20140283. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[43] Optimal control for mathematical models of cancer therapies, An application of geometric methods. In Vol. 42 of Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics. Springer, New York (2015). | MR | Zbl
and ,[44] Optimal distributed control of an extended model of tumor growth with logarithmic potential. Appl. Math. Optim. 82 (2020) 517–549. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[45] Optimal treatment for a phase field system of Cahn–Hilliard type modeling tumor growth by asymptotic scheme. Math. Control Related Fields 10 (2020) 305–331. | MR | Zbl
,[46] Optimality conditions for an extended tumor growth model with double obstacle potential via deep quench approach. Evol. Equ. Control Theory 9 (2020) 193–217. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[47] $L^p ( 0 , T ; B )$. Ann. Matemat. Pura Appl. 146 (1986) 65–96. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, Compact sets in the space[48] Optimal distributed control of a Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system with mass sources. To appear in: Appl. Math. Optim. (2019). | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[49] Role of optimal control theory in cancer chemotherapy. Math. Biosci. 101 (1990) 237–284. | DOI | Zbl
,[50] Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications. In Vol. 112 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Am. Math. Soc. (2010). | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[51] Optimal control of the convective Cahn–Hilliard equation. Appl. Anal. 92 (2013) 1028–1045. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[52] Optimal control for the convective Cahn–Hilliard equation in 2D case. Appl. Math. Optim. 70 (2014) 61–82. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[53] Nonlinear simulation of tumor necrosis, neo-vascularization and tissue invasion via an adaptive finite-element/level-set method. Bull. Math. Biol. 67 (2005) 211–259. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,Cité par Sources :