Many researchers have concentrated on production planning issues by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). However, the assumption made by existing approaches that all decision making units (DMUs) are equipped with the same level of production technology is not realistic. Additionally, with the development in the society, environmental factors have come to play important roles in the production process as well. Thus, undesirable outputs should be considered in production planning problems. Therefore, this paper considers the technology heterogeneity factors and undesirable outputs using the data envelopment analysis-based production planning approach. Two examples containing a numerical example that compare with other method and a real sample that concerns the industrial development of 30 provinces in China are used to validate the applicability of our approach.
Mots-clés : Data envelopment analysis, production planning, undesirable outputs, technology heterogeneity
@article{RO_2020__54_2_325_0, author = {Liang, Changyong and Wang, Binyou and Ding, Tao and Ma, Yinchao}, title = {DEA based production planning considering technology heterogeneity with undesirable outputs}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {325--339}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {54}, number = {2}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2018098}, mrnumber = {4069298}, zbl = {1437.90070}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018098/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Liang, Changyong AU - Wang, Binyou AU - Ding, Tao AU - Ma, Yinchao TI - DEA based production planning considering technology heterogeneity with undesirable outputs JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2020 SP - 325 EP - 339 VL - 54 IS - 2 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018098/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2018098 LA - en ID - RO_2020__54_2_325_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Liang, Changyong %A Wang, Binyou %A Ding, Tao %A Ma, Yinchao %T DEA based production planning considering technology heterogeneity with undesirable outputs %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2020 %P 325-339 %V 54 %N 2 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018098/ %R 10.1051/ro/2018098 %G en %F RO_2020__54_2_325_0
Liang, Changyong; Wang, Binyou; Ding, Tao; Ma, Yinchao. DEA based production planning considering technology heterogeneity with undesirable outputs. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 54 (2020) no. 2, pp. 325-339. doi : 10.1051/ro/2018098. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018098/
[1] Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[2] A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 (2014) 640–650. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[3] Carbon efficiency evaluation: an analytical framework using fuzzy DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253 (2016) 428–440. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , , and ,[4] Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ. 30 (2008) 1–14. | DOI
, and ,[5] A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 210 (2011) 390–397. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , , and ,[6] Environmental performance analysis of Chinese industry from a slacks-based perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 228 (2012) 65–80. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[7] Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s regional industry: a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 142 (2017) 846–853. | DOI
and ,[8] DEA-based production planning. Omega 38 (2010) 105–112. | DOI
, , and ,[9] DEA-based production planning changes in general situation. Appl. Math. Sci. 71 (2010) 3523–3536. | MR | Zbl
and ,[10] Production planning: a DEA-based approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 56 (2011) 369–376. | DOI
and ,[11] Production planning in data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 (2012) 212–218. | DOI
and ,[12] Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function. Int. J. Bus. Econ. 2 (2002) 87–93.
and ,[13] A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. J. Productivity Anal. 21 (2004) 91–103. | DOI
, and ,[14] Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Econ. 34 (2008) 231–255. | DOI
, and ,[15] DEA-based production planning considering influencing factors. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66 (2015) 1878–1886. | DOI
, , , and ,[16] A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189 (2008) 1–18. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[17] Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 71 (1989) 90–98. | DOI
, , and ,[18] Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001) 312–325. | DOI | Zbl
and ,[19] Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 42 (2002) 16–20. | DOI | Zbl
and ,[20] Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy 32 (2007) 1055–1066. | DOI
, and ,[21] Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Appl. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 1665–1676. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,[22] Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega 56 (2015) 74–87. | DOI
, , , and ,[23] Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245 (2015) 517–530. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[24] A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist-Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs. Omega 51 (2015) 29–37. | DOI
, and ,[25] Uncertain network data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs to evaluate the efficiency of electricity power production and distribution processes. Comput. Ind. Eng. 88 (2015) 131–150. | DOI
and ,[26] Efficient allocation of resources. Econometric Soc. 19 (1951) 455–465. | DOI
,[27] Social sustainability measured by intermediate approach for DEA environmental assessment: Chinese regional planning for economic development and pollution prevention. Energy Econ. 66 (2017) 154–166. | DOI
and ,[28] Spatial club convergence of regional energy efficiency in China. Ecol. Indic. 51 (2015) 25–30. | DOI
, and ,[29] Review of the network environmental efficiencies of listed petroleum enterprises in China. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 43 (2015) 65–71. | DOI
, and ,[30] A new approach in modelling undesirable output in DEA model. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62 (2011) 2146–2156. | DOI
and ,[31] The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants. Energy Policy. 38 (2010) 4440–4444. | DOI
and ,[32] Two-stage network structures with undesirable intermediate outputs reused: a DEA based approach. Comput. Econ. 46 (2015) 455–477. | DOI
, and ,[33] Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to Canadian pulp and paper industry. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 83 (2001) 605–616. | DOI
and ,[34] Centralized fixed cost and resource allocation considering technology heterogeneity: a DEA approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 268 (2017) 497–511. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[35] Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. 22 (2004) 143–161. | DOI
and ,[36] On centralized resource utilization and its reallocation by using DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. 221 (2014) 273–283. | DOI | Zbl
, , and ,[37] Centralized resource allocation based on the cost–revenue analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 85 (2015) 395–401. | DOI
and ,[38] Efficient allocation of CO2 emissions in China: a zero sum gains data envelopment model. J. Cleaner Prod. 112 (2016) 4144–4150. | DOI
, and ,Cité par Sources :