Product quality depends on the quality investment of the manufacturer and quality decisions of the supplier. Therefore, many firms and researchers pay considerable attention to supply quality management. Considering a supply chain that includes two competing suppliers and one manufacturer, this paper investigates the influences of competition and the “brand halo” effect on the quality strategies of channel members, and explores the potential coordinating power of the bilateral participation contract. Utilizing differential game theory, this paper compares and analyzes the quality strategies of all channel members under three different scenarios: (i) decentralized scenario within a subsidy program, (ii) integrated scenario, and (iii) bilateral participation contract. Our results confirm the following results. (1) The manufacturer may not grant a subsidy to the supplier if two final products are highly competitive. (2) Supply chain members are more likely to join the bilateral participation contract if the “brand halo” effect is large. (3) The bilateral participation contract can achieve perfect coordination if the competition is weak or if a transfer payment policy exists.
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2018039
@article{RO_2019__53_4_1407_0, author = {Xu, Qingyun and Xu, Bing and He, Yi}, title = {Channel coordination through quality improvement with brand halo effect}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {1407--1425}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {53}, number = {4}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2018039}, mrnumber = {4001616}, zbl = {1425.90019}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018039/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Xu, Qingyun AU - Xu, Bing AU - He, Yi TI - Channel coordination through quality improvement with brand halo effect JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2019 SP - 1407 EP - 1425 VL - 53 IS - 4 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018039/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2018039 LA - en ID - RO_2019__53_4_1407_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Xu, Qingyun %A Xu, Bing %A He, Yi %T Channel coordination through quality improvement with brand halo effect %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2019 %P 1407-1425 %V 53 %N 4 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018039/ %R 10.1051/ro/2018039 %G en %F RO_2019__53_4_1407_0
Xu, Qingyun; Xu, Bing; He, Yi. Channel coordination through quality improvement with brand halo effect. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 53 (2019) no. 4, pp. 1407-1425. doi : 10.1051/ro/2018039. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018039/
Quality implications of warranties in a supply chain. Manag. Sci. 51 (2005) 1266–1277. | DOI | Zbl
and ,Quality and competition. Manag. Sci. 44 (1998) 1179–1192. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,Brand equity in the business-to-business market. Ind. Market. Manag. 33 (2004) 371–380. | DOI
, and ,The “Brand Halo” Effect on durable goods prices: brand reliability and the used car market. Acad. Market. Stud. J. 8 (2004) 7.
and ,Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts. Manag. Sci. 55 (2009) 1122–1138. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Manage. Sci. 49 (2003) 1–20. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,Competitive and collaborative quality and warranty management in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (2012) 129–144. | DOI
, and ,Quality improvement vs. advertising support: which strategy works better for a manufacturer? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 208 (2011) 119–130. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Quality management in multi-level supply chains with outsourced manufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 25 (2016) 290–305. | DOI
, , and ,Proposing a delay in payment contract for coordinating a two-echelon periodic review supply chain with stochastic promotional effort dependent demand. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 10 (2019) 1037–1050. | DOI
, and ,Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: a two-stage game approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 156 (2014) 260–268. | DOI
,Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206 (2010) 329–340. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,Towards an understanding of supply chain quality management. J. Oper. Manag. 26 (2008) 461–467. | DOI
,The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 96 (2005) 339–354. | DOI
, and ,Customer loyalty and supplier quality competition. Manag. Sci. 48 (2002) 207–221. | DOI | Zbl
,Horizontal cooperative programmes and cooperative advertising. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52 (2014) 691–712. | DOI
, , , and ,Supply chain coordination in quality improvement with reference effects. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 67 (2016) 1158–1168. | DOI
, , and ,Quality investment and inspection policy in a supplier-manufacturer supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202 (2010) 717–729. | DOI | Zbl
and ,Supply chain coordination for fuzzy random newsboy problem with imperfect quality. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 51 (2010) 771–784. | DOI | Zbl
, , , and ,A study of brand equity in an organizational-buying context. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 6 (1997) 428–439. | DOI
,Coordination of cooperative promotion efforts with competing retailers in a manufacturer-retailer supply chain. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 6 (2018) 25–48. | DOI
and ,Supplier-manufacturer collaboration on new product development. In: Advances in Dynamic Game Theory. Birkhäuser, Boston (2007) 527–545. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,Side-payment contracts in two-person nonzero-sum supply chain games: Review, discussion and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (2009) 600–618. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,Implications for the role of retailers in quality assurance. Prod. Oper. Manag. 25 (2016) 779–790. | DOI
, and ,A general multitiered supply chain network model of quality competition with suppliers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 170 (2015) 336–356. | DOI
and ,Producer-supplier contracts with incomplete information. Manag. Sci. 47 (2001) 709–715. | DOI | Zbl
,Coordinating a supply chain with negative effect of retailer’s local promotion on goodwill and reference price. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 227–252. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
, and ,Global product quality and corporate social responsibility perceptions: a cross-national study of halo effects. J. Int. Market. 20 (2012) 42–57. | DOI
, and ,Two-way product recovery in a closed-loop supply chain with variable markup under price and quality dependent demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 183 (2017) 259–272. | DOI
and ,Dynamics of competing with quality-and advertising-based goodwill. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175 (2006) 462–474. | DOI | Zbl
and ,The bargaining problem. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 18 (1950) 155–162. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Coordination of social responsibility and order quantity in a two-echelon supply chain: a collaborative decision-making perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 184 (2017) 107–121. | DOI
, and ,Economic and social collaborative decision-making on visit interval and service level in a two-echelon pharmaceutical supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017) 3956–3969. | DOI
, and ,Coordinating a socially responsible pharmaceutical supply chain under periodic review replenishment policies. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018) 2876–2891. | DOI
, , , and ,Coordinating manufacturer’s innovation and retailer’s promotion and replenishment using a compensation-based wholesale price contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 198 (2018) 11–24.
, , and ,Call center outsourcing: coordinating staffing level and service quality. Manag. Sci. 54 (2008) 369–383. | DOI | Zbl
and ,The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts. Manag. Sci. 41 (1995) 1581–1589. | DOI | Zbl
and ,Defining the concept of supply chain quality management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 96 (2005) 315–337. | DOI
and ,It takes quality to be preferred by world’s biggest chipmaker. Purchasing 130 (2001) 21–23.
,Quality strategies in supply chain alliances of disposable items. Omega 31 (2003) 499–509. | DOI
, and ,Leading Six Sigma: a step-by-step guide based on experience with GE and other Six Sigma companies. Ft Press (2003).
and ,Lost sales reduction and quality improvement with variable lead time and fuzzy costs in an imperfect production system. RAIRO: OR 52 (2018) 819–837. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
, , and ,Consumers risk and quality control in a collaborative supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182 (2007) 683–694. | DOI | Zbl
,Vertical product line extension strategies: an evaluation of brand halo effect according to range level. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition) 24 (2009) 73–88. | DOI
, , ,Advertising strategies for mobile platforms with “Apps”. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 48 (2018) 767–778. | DOI
, , and ,Coordinating a supply chain with a quality assurance policy via a revenue-sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49 (2011) 99–120. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,Quality improvement in competing supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 134 (2011) 262–270. | DOI
, and ,Quality investment and price decision in a risk-averse supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214 (2011) 403–410. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,Contract efficiency for a decentralized supply chain in the presence of quality improvement. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 22 (2015) 713–734. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,Pushing quality improvement along supply chains. Manag. Sci. 53 (2007) 421–436. | DOI | Zbl
, and ,Cité par Sources :