In this study, we employ a game-theory-based framework to model power structure and consumers’ heterogeneity toward the environmental level of products in a green supply chain and examine how consumer’s heterogeneity and power structure affect green product development and the performance of green supply chain. The key findings indicate that it can be optimal for the retailer to charge a higher selling price in the integrated supply chain, which is contrast to previous finding in the literature. Importantly, we identify a condition where there is no power conflict in the green supply chain, which indicates that the manufacturer is willing to drop its power while the retailer is willing to possess power resulting in a “power equilibrium”. Also, heterogeneous environment awareness of consumer considerably affect the value of channel integration. Overlooking heterogeneous responses would result in either undercutting or overestimating the benefit from channel integration.
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2018005
Mots-clés : Green supply chain, heterogeneous environment awareness, power structure, game theory
@article{RO_2018__52_1_143_0,
author = {Xue, Musen and Zhang, Jianxiong},
title = {Impacts of heterogeneous environment awareness and power structure on green supply chain},
journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
pages = {143--157},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {52},
number = {1},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2018005},
mrnumber = {3812473},
zbl = {1398.90020},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018005/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Xue, Musen AU - Zhang, Jianxiong TI - Impacts of heterogeneous environment awareness and power structure on green supply chain JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2018 SP - 143 EP - 157 VL - 52 IS - 1 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018005/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2018005 LA - en ID - RO_2018__52_1_143_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Xue, Musen %A Zhang, Jianxiong %T Impacts of heterogeneous environment awareness and power structure on green supply chain %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2018 %P 143-157 %V 52 %N 1 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018005/ %R 10.1051/ro/2018005 %G en %F RO_2018__52_1_143_0
Xue, Musen; Zhang, Jianxiong. Impacts of heterogeneous environment awareness and power structure on green supply chain. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 1, pp. 143-157. doi : 10.1051/ro/2018005. https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2018005/
[1] and , A mathematical model for green supply chain coordination with substitutable products. J. Clean. Prod. 145 (2017) 232–249. | DOI
[2] and , Do models of vertical strategic interaction for national and store brands meet the market test? J. Retail. 77 (2001) 83–109. | DOI
[3] , Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Manag. Sci. 47 (2001) 250–263. | DOI
[4] , and , Cartelization or Cost-sharing? Comparison of cooperation modes in a green supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 156 (2017) 159–173. | DOI
[5] , and , Channel bargaining with retailer asymmetry. J. Market. Res. 43 (2006) 84–97. | DOI
[6] and , Power measurement in the distribution channel. J. Mark. Res. 9 (1972) 47–52. | DOI
[7] and , A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135 (2012) 568–583. | DOI
[8] and , Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 319–329. | DOI
[9] and , Bargaining and Information Sharing in Distribution Channels. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York (2004).
[10] , Stability in competition. J. Econ. 39 (1929) 41–57. | DOI
[11] and , A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Mark. Res. 40 (2003) 80–100. | DOI
[12] and , Retail mergers, buyer power and product variety. Econ. J. 117 (2007) 45–67. | DOI
[13] and , Buyer power and supplier incentives. Eur. Econ. Rev. 51 (2007) 647–667. | DOI
[14] and , Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (2012) 85–100. | DOI
[15] and , Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: the impact on plant-level environment. Prod. Oper. Manag. 12 (2003) 336–352. | DOI
[16] and , Guaranteed profit margins: a demonstration of retailer power. Int. J. Res. Mark. 14 (1997) 35–56. | DOI
[17] and , Information provision in a vertically differentiated competitive marketplace. Mark. Sci. 29 (2010) 122–138. | DOI
[18] , , and , Pricing policies of a competitive dual channel supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016) 2029–2042. | DOI
[19] , and , Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218 (2012) 602–613. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[20] and , Environmental and societal assessments for sustainable product and supply chain design, in Proceedings of the 2011 IIE Annual Conference (2011) 1–8.
[21] , Starting to Create a Green Supply Chain Can Add to the Bottom Line. Available at https://www.thebalance.com/introduction-to-the-green-supply-chain-2221084 (2017).
[22] , and , The role of collaboration in the UK green supply chains: an exploratory study of the perspectives of suppliers, logistics and retailers. J. Clean. Prod. 70 (2014) 231–241. | DOI
[23] , Simmons Media and Markets 1991 Syndicates Survey-Earth Calling: Is America Listening? Simmons Market Research Bureau, New York (1992).
[24] , Bargaining in Distribution Channels With Multiproduct Retailers. Working paper, Simson School of Business, University of Rochester (2001).
[25] , and , Consumer heterogeneity, product quality, and distribution channels. Manag. Sci. 59 (2013) 1162–1176. | DOI
[26] , and , Impact of power structure on supply chains with uncertain demand. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22 (2013) 1232–1249. | DOI
[27] , Marketing green product in the triad. Columbia J. World Bus. 27 (1992) 268–285.
[28] , Structural analysis of manufacturer pricing in the presence of a strategic retailer. Mark. Sci. 20 (2001) 244–264. | DOI
[29] , , Channel coordination in green supply chain management. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64 (2013) 336–351 | DOI
[30] , , , and , Using TODIM to evalute green supply chain practices under uncertainty. Appl. Math. Model. 38 (2014) 2983–2995. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[31] and , Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 26 (2006) 795–821. | DOI
[32] , Protecting Environment Tops Public Concerns in Poll. Available at http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-05/16/content_17511326.htm (2014).
[33] , and , Strategic supply chain structure design for a proprietary component manufacturer. Prod. Oper. Manag. 19 (2010) 371–389. | DOI
[34] , and , Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structures of channel dominance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239 (2014) 130–145. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[35] , Contract efficiency for a decentralized supply chain in the presence of quality improvement. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 22 (2015) 713–734. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[36] , and , Strategic waiting for consumer-generated quality information: dynamic pricing of new experience goods. Manag. Sci. 62 (2016) 410–435. | DOI
[37] and , Research on coordination mechanism in three-level green supply chain under non-cooperative game. Appl. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 3369–3379. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[38] , and , Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 241 (2015) 63–73. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[39] and , Green product design in supply chains under competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258 (2017) 165–180. | DOI | MR | Zbl
Cité par Sources :
