Multi-project management has been a trend of many large organizations’ operations and a preferred organizational strategy in complex and dynamic environments. For an organization to achieve its strategy, it must integrate various projects into a project portfolio and implement coordinated management to make sure that these projects co-evolve in the direction of the overall strategy. As some elements in project portfolio (PP) cannot be quantified or determined accurately, a PP could be characterized as an uncertain and fuzzy problem where it is difficult to measure the co-evolution efficacy. To solve this difficulty, in this paper, we first propose a conceptual framework of Project Portfolio based on Strategic Orientation (PPSO) with quantitative indices and process of the co-evolution. A mathematical model based on Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis(FDEA) is built to measure the co-evolution efficacy of the PPSO, and provides a basis for optimal PPSO selection. The model is verified by a computational experiment based on actual data provided by a Chinese firm of HPM, a reputable Chinese project management consulting firm, which has also been officially certified by the International Project Management Association (IPMA). The results suggest that co-evolution efficacy is reasonably effective for selecting the optimal PPSO. To our knowledge, this study is the first time to apply the notion of co-evolution efficacy and fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis to the PP domain, which enriches the theories of project management and strategic management. Also, this study makes an important contribution to integrating a group of projects into a PP under the strategic direction and helping an organization optimize its strategic management.
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2017083
Mots clés : Co-evolution efficacy, project portfolio, quantitative Indices and process, fuzzy data envelopment analysis
@article{RO_2018__52_2_645_0, author = {Bai, LiBiao and Du, Qiang}, title = {Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation}, journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle}, pages = {645--659}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {52}, number = {2}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1051/ro/2017083}, mrnumber = {3880532}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Bai, LiBiao AU - Du, Qiang TI - Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation JO - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle PY - 2018 SP - 645 EP - 659 VL - 52 IS - 2 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2017083 LA - en ID - RO_2018__52_2_645_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Bai, LiBiao %A Du, Qiang %T Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation %J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle %D 2018 %P 645-659 %V 52 %N 2 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/ %R 10.1051/ro/2017083 %G en %F RO_2018__52_2_645_0
Bai, LiBiao; Du, Qiang. Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 2, pp. 645-659. doi : 10.1051/ro/2017083. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/
[1] Research on the Theory Frame and Method of Project Portfolio Selection. Northwestern Polytechnical University (2007)
,[2] Simulating the dynamic scheduling of the PPs. Simul. Model. Practice Theory 18 (2010) 1428–1441 | DOI
, and ,[3] An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Inter. J. Project Manag. 17 (1999) 207–216 | DOI
and ,[4] Optimization model of the Strategy of close degree for Project Portfolio Allocation Based on QFD. J. Industrial Eng. Eng. Manag. 4 (2014) 027
, and ,[5] Resource-constrained Project Scheduling with Overlapping Activities Based on Extended Dependency Structure Matrix. Inter. J. Plant Eng. Manag. 4 (2013) 002
, , and ,[6] Establishing project portfolio management: An exploratory analysis of the influence of internal stakeholders’ interactions. Project Manag. J. 43 (2012) 16–32 | DOI
, and[7] Synergetic Management of Green Project Portfolio Configuration. Sci. Techn. Manag. Res. 36 (2016) 242–246
, and ,[8] Declarative Modeling for Production Order Portfolio Scheduling. Found. Manag. 6 (2014) 7–24 | DOI
and ,[9] Project Portfolio Allocation Strategy of Close Degree Based on Fuzzy Matter-element and Rough Set Theory. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 5 (2014) 034
, and ,[10] Integrating sustainability into innovation project portfolio management – A strategic perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 34 (2014) 46–62 | DOI
and ,[11] Evaluation Indexes of Degree of Closeness between Strategy and Project Portfolio Allocation. Amer. J. Oper. Res. 5 (2015) 38
and ,[12] Measuring portfolio strategic performance using key performance indicators. Project Manag. J. 41 (2010) 64–73 | DOI
and ,[13] New product portfolio management: practices and performance. J. Product Innovation Manag. 16 (1999) 333–351 | DOI
, and ,[14] Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders-I.Res. Technol. Manag. 40 (1997) 16–28 | DOI
, and ,[15] Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study. Strategic Manag. J. 9 (1988) 123–139 | DOI
, and ,[16] Project Portfolio Management-an organising perspective. Chalmers University of Technology (2006)
,[17] A Multi-Phase Framework of R&D Project Balanced Portfolio Selection. Science Sci. Manag. Sci. Tech. 11 (2006) 006
, and , .[18] The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management?. Inter. J. Project Manag. 21 (2003) 403–409 | DOI
and ,[19] Research on Multi-projects Synergistic Management. China ’s High – Tech Enterprises 1 (2009) 167–169
and ,[20] Fuzzy Mathematics and Fuzzy Optimization. Beijing: Science Press (1997)
and ,[21] Strategic project portfolio selection for national research institutes. J. Business Res. 68 (2015) 2305–2311 | DOI
and ,[22] The timing of egg maturation in insects: ovigeny index and initial egg load as measures of fitness and of resource allocation. Oikos 107 (2004) 449–461 | DOI
and ,[23] Potential performance and tests of portfolio efficiency. J. Financial Econ. 10 (1982) 433–466 | DOI
and ,[24] Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance. Inter. J. Project Manag. 28 (2010) 818–831 | DOI
,[25] A survey of deterministic modeling approaches for project scheduling under resource constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2008) 1–14
and ,[26] Project Portfolio Management in a Company Strategy Implementation, a Computational experiment. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sci. 119 (2014) 229–236 | DOI
,[27] The integration of ideation and project portfolio management-A key factor for sustainable success. Inter. J. Project Manag. 30 (2012) 582–595 | DOI
,[28] A competitive genetic algorithm for resource-constrained project scheduling. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 45 (1998) 733–750 | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[29] A modified model of DEA and its application on efficacy evaluation of Several industries in a certain region. System Engineering Theory-Methodology-Applications 2 (2003)
, and ,[30] A differential evolution algorithm to solve multi-skilled project portfolio scheduling problems. Inter. J. Adv. Manufacturing Techn. 64 (2013) 1099–1111 | DOI
, , and ,[31] Research on the Project Portfolio Allocation under the Organizational Strategy Guide. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern Polytechnical University (2015)
,[32] DEA Model and Its Application Based on Transformation of Fuzzy Number. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 4 (2004) 012 | MR
, and ,[33] Resource allocation under uncertain in a multi-project matrix environment: Is organizational conflict inevitable?. Inter. J. Project Manag. 26 (2008) 773–788 | DOI
and ,[34] Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 2 (2010) 020
and ,[35] An improving completely ranking approach for interval DEA. Syst. Eng. 1 (2006) 019
and ,[36] Research on the Adaptability to Internal and External Environment of Enterprise Based on AHP. J. Reform and Strategy 25 (2009) 159–162
and ,[37] Measurement issues in the evaluation of projects in a project portfolio. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245 (2015) 789–796 | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[38] Project portfolio management in practice and in context. Inter. J. Project Manag. 31 (2013) 794–803 | DOI
,[39] The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success – a conceptual framework. Inter. J. Project Manag. 28 (2010) 807–817 | DOI
,[40] The project portfolio selection and scheduling problem: mathematical model and algorithms. J. Optimiz. Industrial Eng. 6 (2013) 65–72
,[41] DEA cross-evaluation analysis with MATLAB. J. Southwest University for Nationalities ⋅ Natural Science Edition 30 (2004) 553–556
, and ,[42] Fuzzy DEA Efficiency. Syst. Eng. – Theory Methodology Appl. 6 (1997) 61–64
,[43] Key attributes of effectiveness in managing project portfolio. Inter. J. Project Manag. 33 (2015) 1084–1097 | DOI
,[44] A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – 5th Edition. Project Manag. J. 44 (2013) e1–e1 | DOI
,[45] A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153 (2004) 675–686 | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[46] Resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: Theory and computation. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 90 (1996) 320–333 | DOI | Zbl
and ¡name¿ ¡/name¿[47] Research on Project Portfolio Allocation Based on Strategic Orientation. Res. Sci. Technology Manag. 16 (2013) 186–189
, and ,[48] Research on Enterprise Project Portfolio Management and Portfolio Evaluation. Northwestern Polytechnical University (2005)
,[49] A Bayesian approach to testing portfolio efficiency. J. Financial Econ. 19 (1987) 195–215 | DOI
,[50] 23 Statistical methods in tests of portfolio efficiency: A synthesis. Handbook Statis. 14 (1996) 693–711 | DOI | MR
,[51] On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. Inter. J. Project Manag. 21 (2003) 1–8 | DOI
and ,[52] A new solution approach to solve the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with logical constraints. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 249 (2016) 577–591 | MR | Zbl
and ,[53] Strategic Closeness for Aerospace Project Portfolio Allocation Based on Synergistic Theory. Spacecraft Environment Engineering 32 (2015) 217–223
, and ,[54] Fuzzy Super-efficacy DEA model. Chinese J. Manag. Sci. 17 (2009) 117–124
, and ,[55] Application of multiagent systems in project management. Inter. J. Production Econ. 68 (2000) 185–197 | DOI
, and ,[56] Type DEA Model and Its Transformation. Syst. Eng. 2 (2000) 61–65
, and ,[57] Fuzzy set theory and its applications second. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1992) | MR | Zbl
,[58] Coordination efficiency evaluating of air-defense missile composite group. Syst. Eng. Electronics 31 (2009) 1923–1926
, and ,Cité par Sources :