Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 2, pp. 645-659.

Multi-project management has been a trend of many large organizations’ operations and a preferred organizational strategy in complex and dynamic environments. For an organization to achieve its strategy, it must integrate various projects into a project portfolio and implement coordinated management to make sure that these projects co-evolve in the direction of the overall strategy. As some elements in project portfolio (PP) cannot be quantified or determined accurately, a PP could be characterized as an uncertain and fuzzy problem where it is difficult to measure the co-evolution efficacy. To solve this difficulty, in this paper, we first propose a conceptual framework of Project Portfolio based on Strategic Orientation (PPSO) with quantitative indices and process of the co-evolution. A mathematical model based on Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis(FDEA) is built to measure the co-evolution efficacy of the PPSO, and provides a basis for optimal PPSO selection. The model is verified by a computational experiment based on actual data provided by a Chinese firm of HPM, a reputable Chinese project management consulting firm, which has also been officially certified by the International Project Management Association (IPMA). The results suggest that co-evolution efficacy is reasonably effective for selecting the optimal PPSO. To our knowledge, this study is the first time to apply the notion of co-evolution efficacy and fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis to the PP domain, which enriches the theories of project management and strategic management. Also, this study makes an important contribution to integrating a group of projects into a PP under the strategic direction and helping an organization optimize its strategic management.

Reçu le :
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2017083
Classification : 90B50, 94D05
Mots-clés : Co-evolution efficacy, project portfolio, quantitative Indices and process, fuzzy data envelopment analysis
Bai, LiBiao 1 ; Du, Qiang 1

1 
@article{RO_2018__52_2_645_0,
     author = {Bai, LiBiao and Du, Qiang},
     title = {Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation},
     journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
     pages = {645--659},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {52},
     number = {2},
     year = {2018},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2017083},
     mrnumber = {3880532},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bai, LiBiao
AU  - Du, Qiang
TI  - Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation
JO  - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
PY  - 2018
SP  - 645
EP  - 659
VL  - 52
IS  - 2
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2017083
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2018__52_2_645_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Bai, LiBiao
%A Du, Qiang
%T Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation
%J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
%D 2018
%P 645-659
%V 52
%N 2
%I EDP-Sciences
%U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/
%R 10.1051/ro/2017083
%G en
%F RO_2018__52_2_645_0
Bai, LiBiao; Du, Qiang. Co-evolution efficacy of project portfolio based on strategic orientation. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 52 (2018) no. 2, pp. 645-659. doi : 10.1051/ro/2017083. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017083/

[1] H.G. An, Research on the Theory Frame and Method of Project Portfolio Selection. Northwestern Polytechnical University (2007)

[2] J.A. Araúzo, J. Pajares and A. Lopez–Paredes, Simulating the dynamic scheduling of the PPs. Simul. Model. Practice Theory 18 (2010) 1428–1441 | DOI

[3] N.P. Archer and F. Ghasemzadeh, An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Inter. J. Project Manag. 17 (1999) 207–216 | DOI

[4] S.J. Bai, L.B. Bai and Y.T. Guo, Optimization model of the Strategy of close degree for Project Portfolio Allocation Based on QFD. J. Industrial Eng. Eng. Manag. 4 (2014) 027

[5] L.B. Bai, H.Y. Song, S.J. Bai and Y.T. Guo, Resource-constrained Project Scheduling with Overlapping Activities Based on Extended Dependency Structure Matrix. Inter. J. Plant Eng. Manag. 4 (2013) 002

[6] C. Beringer, D. Jonas and H. Georg Gemünden Establishing project portfolio management: An exploratory analysis of the influence of internal stakeholders’ interactions. Project Manag. J. 43 (2012) 16–32 | DOI

[7] L.B. Bai, S.J. Bai and Y.T. Guo, Synergetic Management of Green Project Portfolio Configuration. Sci. Techn. Manag. Res. 36 (2016) 242–246

[8] Z. Banaszak and G. Bocewicz, Declarative Modeling for Production Order Portfolio Scheduling. Found. Manag. 6 (2014) 7–24 | DOI

[9] L.B. Bai,S.J. Bai and Y.T. Guo, Project Portfolio Allocation Strategy of Close Degree Based on Fuzzy Matter-element and Rough Set Theory. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 5 (2014) 034

[10] J.W. Brook and F. Pagnanelli, Integrating sustainability into innovation project portfolio management – A strategic perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 34 (2014) 46–62 | DOI

[11] L. Bai and S. Bai, Evaluation Indexes of Degree of Closeness between Strategy and Project Portfolio Allocation. Amer. J. Oper. Res. 5 (2015) 38

[12] H. Sanchez and B. Robert, Measuring portfolio strategic performance using key performance indicators. Project Manag. J. 41 (2010) 64–73 | DOI

[13] R.G. Cooper, S.J. Edgett and E.J. Kleinschmidt, New product portfolio management: practices and performance. J. Product Innovation Manag. 16 (1999) 333–351 | DOI

[14] R.G. Cooper, S.J. Edgett and E.J. Kleinschmidt, Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders-I.Res. Technol. Manag. 40 (1997) 16–28 | DOI

[15] R.L. Draft, J. Sormunen and D. Parks, Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study. Strategic Manag. J. 9 (1988) 123–139 | DOI

[16] O. Dawidson, Project Portfolio Management-an organising perspective. Chalmers University of Technology (2006)

[17] X. Du, S.Sun and L. Ou, . A Multi-Phase Framework of R&D Project Balanced Portfolio Selection. Science Sci. Manag. Sci. Tech. 11 (2006) 006

[18] M. Engwall and A. Jerbrant, The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management?. Inter. J. Project Manag. 21 (2003) 403–409 | DOI

[19] J.Q. Feng and Z. Zhang, Research on Multi-projects Synergistic Management. China ’s High – Tech Enterprises 1 (2009) 167–169

[20] S. Fang and D. Wang, Fuzzy Mathematics and Fuzzy Optimization. Beijing: Science Press (1997)

[21] D.J.F. Jeng and K.H. Huang, Strategic project portfolio selection for national research institutes. J. Business Res. 68 (2015) 2305–2311 | DOI

[22] M.A. Jervis and P.N. Ferns, The timing of egg maturation in insects: ovigeny index and initial egg load as measures of fitness and of resource allocation. Oikos 107 (2004) 449–461 | DOI

[23] J.D. Jobson and B. Korkie, Potential performance and tests of portfolio efficiency. J. Financial Econ. 10 (1982) 433–466 | DOI

[24] D. Jonas, Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance. Inter. J. Project Manag. 28 (2010) 818–831 | DOI

[25] S. Hartmann and D. Briskorn, A survey of deterministic modeling approaches for project scheduling under resource constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2008) 1–14

[26] I. Hyväri, Project Portfolio Management in a Company Strategy Implementation, a Computational experiment. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sci. 119 (2014) 229–236 | DOI

[27] W. Heising, The integration of ideation and project portfolio management-A key factor for sustainable success. Inter. J. Project Manag. 30 (2012) 582–595 | DOI

[28] S. Hartmann, A competitive genetic algorithm for resource-constrained project scheduling. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 45 (1998) 733–750 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[29] J.P. Guo, Y.H. Wu and W.H. Li, A modified model of DEA and its application on efficacy evaluation of Several industries in a certain region. System Engineering Theory-Methodology-Applications 2 (2003)

[30] H. Kazemipoor, R. Tavakkoli−Moghaddam, P. Shahnazari−Shahrezaei and A. Azaron, A differential evolution algorithm to solve multi-skilled project portfolio scheduling problems. Inter. J. Adv. Manufacturing Techn. 64 (2013) 1099–1111 | DOI

[31] S. Li, Research on the Project Portfolio Allocation under the Organizational Strategy Guide. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern Polytechnical University (2015)

[32] Z.L. Li, S.Q. Chen and J.P. Wu, DEA Model and Its Application Based on Transformation of Fuzzy Number. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 4 (2004) 012 | MR

[33] Z. Laslo and A.I. Goldberg, Resource allocation under uncertain in a multi-project matrix environment: Is organizational conflict inevitable?. Inter. J. Project Manag. 26 (2008) 773–788 | DOI

[34] S. Liu and S.X. Du, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 2 (2010) 020

[35] L. Liang and J. Wu, An improving completely ranking approach for interval DEA. Syst. Eng. 1 (2006) 019

[36] X.B. Li and H.Y. Ge, Research on the Adaptability to Internal and External Environment of Enterprise Based on AHP. J. Reform and Strategy 25 (2009) 159–162

[37] A. Morton, Measurement issues in the evaluation of projects in a project portfolio. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245 (2015) 789–796 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[38] M. Martinsuo, Project portfolio management in practice and in context. Inter. J. Project Manag. 31 (2013) 794–803 | DOI

[39] S. Meskendahl, The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success – a conceptual framework. Inter. J. Project Manag. 28 (2010) 807–817 | DOI

[40] B. Naderi, The project portfolio selection and scheduling problem: mathematical model and algorithms. J. Optimiz. Industrial Eng. 6 (2013) 65–72

[41] Y.W. Peng, S.X. Wu and X.Z. Xu, DEA cross-evaluation analysis with MATLAB. J. Southwest University for Nationalities ⋅ Natural Science Edition 30 (2004) 553–556

[42] Y. Peng, Fuzzy DEA Efficiency. Syst. Eng. – Theory Methodology Appl. 6 (1997) 61–64

[43] P. Patanakul, Key attributes of effectiveness in managing project portfolio. Inter. J. Project Manag. 33 (2015) 1084–1097 | DOI

[44] K.H. Rose, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – 5th Edition. Project Manag. J. 44 (2013) e1–e1 | DOI

[45] C. Romero, A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153 (2004) 675–686 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[46] K.R. Serial and ¡name¿Parallel.¡/name¿ Resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: Theory and computation. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 90 (1996) 320–333 | DOI | Zbl

[47] H.Y. Song, Y.T. Guo and S.J. Bai, Research on Project Portfolio Allocation Based on Strategic Orientation. Res. Sci. Technology Manag. 16 (2013) 186–189

[48] Z.H. Sun, Research on Enterprise Project Portfolio Management and Portfolio Evaluation. Northwestern Polytechnical University (2005)

[49] J. Shanken, A Bayesian approach to testing portfolio efficiency. J. Financial Econ. 19 (1987) 195–215 | DOI

[50] J. Shanken, 23 Statistical methods in tests of portfolio efficiency: A synthesis. Handbook Statis. 14 (1996) 693–711 | DOI | MR

[51] J.R. Turner and R. Müller, On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. Inter. J. Project Manag. 21 (2003) 1–8 | DOI

[52] M. Vanhoucke and J. Coelho, A new solution approach to solve the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with logical constraints. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 249 (2016) 577–591 | MR | Zbl

[53] X.B. Wang, S.J. Bai and L.B. Bai, Strategic Closeness for Aerospace Project Portfolio Allocation Based on Synergistic Theory. Spacecraft Environment Engineering 32 (2015) 217–223

[54] M.Q. Wang, L. Liang and Y.J. Li, Fuzzy Super-efficacy DEA model. Chinese J. Manag. Sci. 17 (2009) 117–124

[55] Y. Yan, T. Kuphal and J. Bode, Application of multiagent systems in project management. Inter. J. Production Econ. 68 (2000) 185–197 | DOI

[56] X.Y. Zeng, Y. Wu and H. Lr, Type DEA Model and Its Transformation. Syst. Eng. 2 (2000) 61–65

[57] H.J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy set theory and its applications second. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1992) | MR | Zbl

[58] S. Zhang, Q.Y. Cheng and Y.L. Wang, Coordination efficiency evaluating of air-defense missile composite group. Syst. Eng. Electronics 31 (2009) 1923–1926

Cité par Sources :