Dea-based models for best partner selection for merger
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 51 (2017) no. 4, pp. 1345-1357.

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) is a process whereby two or more companies merge into one company to improve their efficiency and strengthen their market positions. Previous studies about best partner selection for M&A simply consider one factor independently among several relevant factors. In this paper, DEA is applied to support decision making for best partner selection in M&A for decision making units (DMUs), i.e., the companies. According to the different perspectives of efficiency, revenue, and cost, three models based on DEA approach are firstly introduced to select the best partner for M&A. By compositing these different perspectives, we further propose a new DEA model, which has comprehensively considered input cost, output revenue and efficiency to select the best partner among many candidates. 0–1 integer linear programming models are built to implement the process. Finally, an example is given to verify the applicability to this model.

Reçu le :
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2017031
Classification : 90B50
Mots-clés : Merger and acquisitions, data envelopment analysis, efficiency, decision making units, 0-1integer linear programming
Zhu, Qingyuan 1 ; Wu, Jie 1 ; Chu, Junfei 1 ; Amirteimoori, Alireza 2 ; Sun, Jiasen 3

1 School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province 230026, P.R. China.
2 Department of Applied Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Rasht branch, Rasht, Iran.
3 DongWu Business School (Finance and Economics School), Soochow University, Jiang Su Province 215000, P.R. China.
@article{RO_2017__51_4_1345_0,
     author = {Zhu, Qingyuan and Wu, Jie and Chu, Junfei and Amirteimoori, Alireza and Sun, Jiasen},
     title = {Dea-based models for best partner selection for merger},
     journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
     pages = {1345--1357},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {51},
     number = {4},
     year = {2017},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2017031},
     mrnumber = {3783949},
     zbl = {1398.90089},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017031/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zhu, Qingyuan
AU  - Wu, Jie
AU  - Chu, Junfei
AU  - Amirteimoori, Alireza
AU  - Sun, Jiasen
TI  - Dea-based models for best partner selection for merger
JO  - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
PY  - 2017
SP  - 1345
EP  - 1357
VL  - 51
IS  - 4
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017031/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2017031
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2017__51_4_1345_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Zhu, Qingyuan
%A Wu, Jie
%A Chu, Junfei
%A Amirteimoori, Alireza
%A Sun, Jiasen
%T Dea-based models for best partner selection for merger
%J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
%D 2017
%P 1345-1357
%V 51
%N 4
%I EDP-Sciences
%U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017031/
%R 10.1051/ro/2017031
%G en
%F RO_2017__51_4_1345_0
Zhu, Qingyuan; Wu, Jie; Chu, Junfei; Amirteimoori, Alireza; Sun, Jiasen. Dea-based models for best partner selection for merger. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 51 (2017) no. 4, pp. 1345-1357. doi : 10.1051/ro/2017031. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2017031/

G.R. Amin and S. Al-Muharrami, A new inverse data envelopment analysis model for mergers with negative data. IMA J. Manag. Math. (2016) dpw016. | MR

A. Amirteimoori and A. Emrouznejad, Flexible measures in production process: a DEA-based approach. RAIRO – Oper. Res. 45 (2011) 63–74. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl

A. Amirteimoori and F. Yang, A DEA model for two-stage parallel-series production processes. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 48 (2014) 123–134. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl

R.D. Banker, H. Chang and W.W. Cooper, Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89 (1996) 473–481. | DOI | Zbl

R.D. Banker, Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 17 (1984) 35–44. | DOI | Zbl

P. Bogetoft and D. Wang, Estimating the potential gains from mergers. J. Prod. Anal. 23 (2005) 145–171. | DOI

A.F. Buono and J.L. Bowditch, The human side of mergers and acquisitions: Managing collisions between people, cultures, and organizations. Beard Books (2003).

A. Ceausescu, Merger and Acquisition-A Strategic Option for Companies. Ann. Uni. Petrosani, Econ. (2008) 59–64.

A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | DOI | MR | Zbl

W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford and K. Tone, Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software. 2nd edn. Springer (2007). | Zbl

W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford, Tone and Kaoru, Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, Applications, references, and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer academic publishers, Boston (2000) 136–138.

W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford and J. Zhu, Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. (2004). | MR | Zbl

J.K. Dietrich and E. Sorensen, An application of logit analysis to prediction of merger targets. J. Bus. Res. 12 (1984) 393–402. | DOI

R. Färe, Addition and efficiency. The Quarterly J. Econ. 101 (1986) 861–866. | DOI | Zbl

R. Färe, H. Fukuyama and W.L. Weber, A Mergers and acquisitions index in data envelopment analysis: an application to Japanese Shinkin banks in Kyushu. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Soc. Change. 1 (2010) 1–18. | DOI

R. Färe and S. Grosskopf, Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis: A comment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 79 (1994) 379–382. | DOI | Zbl

R. Färe, S. Grosskopf and C.K. Lovell, The measurement of efficiency of production, Vol. 6. Springer (1985).

R. Färe, S. Grosskopf and D. Margaritis, Coalition formation and data envelopment analysis. J. CENTRUM Cathe. 4 (2011) 216-223. | DOI

M.J Farrell, The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series A (General). (1957) 253–290.

S. Gattoufi, R.A. Gholam and A. Emrouznejad. A new inverse DEA method for merging banks. IMA J. Manag. Math. 25 (2014) 73–87. | DOI | Zbl

K. Gugler and K.A Konrad, Merger target selection and financial structure. University of Vienna and Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB) (2002).

G.E. Halkos, R. Matousek and N.G. Tzeremes, Pre-evaluating technical efficiency gains from possible mergers and acquisitions: evidence from Japanese regional banks. Rev. Quantitative Finance Accounting 46 (2016) 47–77. | DOI

J. Johnes and L. Yu, Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis. China Econ. Rev. 19 (2008) 679–696. | DOI

C. Kao and Y.C. Yang, Reorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 58 (1992) 356–362. | DOI

A.Y. Lewin and R.C. Morey, Measuring the relative efficiency and output potential of public sector organizations: an application of data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Policy Anal. Inf. Syst. 5 (1981) 356–362.

L. Liang, F. Yang, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann. Oper. Res. 145 (2006) 35–49. | DOI | MR | Zbl

C.C. Liu, A DEA study to evaluate the relative efficiency and investigate the reorganization of the credit department of farmers’ associations in Taiwan. Appl. Econ. 39 (2007) 2663–2671. | DOI

F.Y. Lo, C.F. Chien and J.T. Lin, A DEA study to evaluate the relative efficiency and investigate the district reorganization of the Taiwan power company. IEEE. I. Power. Syst. 16 (2001) 170–178. | DOI

S. Lozano, Using DEA to find the best partner for a horizontal cooperation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66 (2013) 286–292. | DOI

S. Lozano and G. Villa, DEA-based pre-merger planning tool. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 61 (2010) 1485–1497. | DOI | Zbl

D. Prior, Technical efficiency and scope economies in hospitals. Appl. Econ. 28 (1996) 1295–1301. | DOI

S. Ragothaman, B. Naik and K. Ramakrishnan, Predicting corporate acquisitions: An application of uncertain reasoning using rule induction. Inform. Syst. Front. 5 (2003) 401–412. | DOI

B.K. Sahoo and K. Tone, Non-parametric measurement of economies of scale and scope in non-competitive environment with price uncertainty. Omega. 41 (2013) 97–111. | DOI

L.M. Seiford and R.M. Thrall, Recent developments in DEA: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J. Eco. 46 (1990) 7–38. | DOI | MR | Zbl

L.M. Seiford and J. Zhu, An investigation of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Omega. 27 (1999) 1–11. | DOI

X. Shi, Y. Li, A. Emrouznejad, J. Xie and L. Liang, Estimation of potential gains from bank mergers: a novel two-stage cost efficiency DEA model. J. Opl. Res. Soc. (2016).

J. Wu and L. Liang, Cross-efficiency evaluation approach to Olympic ranking and benchmarking: the case of Beijing 2008. Inter. J. App. Mngt Sci. 2 (2010) 76–92.

J. Wu, Q.Y. Zhu, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, Best cooperative partner selection and input resource reallocation using DEA. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 67 (2016a) 1221–1237. | DOI

J. Wu, Q.Y. Zhu, X. Ji, J. Chu and L. Liang, Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251 (2016b) 182–197. | DOI | MR | Zbl

F. Yang, D. Wu, L. Liang, G. Bi and D.D. Wu, Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Ann. Oper. Res. 185 (2011) 195–211. | DOI | MR | Zbl

F. Yang, S. Ang, Q. Xia and C. Yang, Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223 (2012) 483–488. | DOI | MR | Zbl

Q.Y. Zhu, J. Wu, X. Li and B. Xiong, China’s regional natural resource allocation and utilization: a DEA-based approach in a big data environment. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017) 809–818. | DOI

Cité par Sources :