In this work, we consider the numerical solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a highly oscillatory potential (NLSE-OP). The NLSE-OP is a model problem which frequently occurs in recent studies of some multiscale dynamical systems, where the potential introduces wide temporal oscillations to the solution and causes numerical difficulties. We aim to analyze rigorously the error bounds of the splitting schemes for solving the NLSE-OP to a fixed time. Our theoretical results show that the Lie–Trotter splitting scheme is uniformly and optimally accurate at the first order provided that the oscillatory potential is integrated exactly, while the Strang splitting scheme is not. Our results apply to general dispersive or wave equations with an oscillatory potential. The error estimates are confirmed by numerical results.
Mots-clés : Nonlinear Schrödinger equation, highly oscillatory potential, Lie–Trotter splitting, Strang splitting, error estimates, uniformly accurate
@article{M2AN_2020__54_5_1491_0, author = {Su, Chunmei and Zhao, Xiaofei}, title = {On time-splitting methods for nonlinear {Schr\"odinger} equation with highly oscillatory potential}, journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis }, pages = {1491--1508}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {54}, number = {5}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1051/m2an/2020006}, mrnumber = {4116683}, zbl = {1451.65163}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2020006/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Su, Chunmei AU - Zhao, Xiaofei TI - On time-splitting methods for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with highly oscillatory potential JO - ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis PY - 2020 SP - 1491 EP - 1508 VL - 54 IS - 5 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2020006/ DO - 10.1051/m2an/2020006 LA - en ID - M2AN_2020__54_5_1491_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Su, Chunmei %A Zhao, Xiaofei %T On time-splitting methods for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with highly oscillatory potential %J ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis %D 2020 %P 1491-1508 %V 54 %N 5 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2020006/ %R 10.1051/m2an/2020006 %G en %F M2AN_2020__54_5_1491_0
Su, Chunmei; Zhao, Xiaofei. On time-splitting methods for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with highly oscillatory potential. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , Tome 54 (2020) no. 5, pp. 1491-1508. doi : 10.1051/m2an/2020006. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/m2an/2020006/
[1] Sobolev Spaces. Elsevier (2003). | MR | Zbl
and ,[2] Analysis and comparison of numerical methods for the Klein-Gordon equation in the nonrelativistic limit regime. Numer. Math. 120 (2012) 189–229. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[3] Uniform error bounds of a finite difference method for the Zakharov system in the subsonic limit regime via an asymptotic consistent formulation. Multiscale Model. Simul. 15 (2017) 977–1002. | DOI | MR
and ,[4] Uniform error bounds of a finite difference method for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system in the subsonic limit regime. Math. Comput. 87 (2018) 2133–2158. | DOI | MR
and ,[5] Uniformly and optimally accurate methods for the Zakharov system in the subsonic limit regime. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40 (2018) A929–A953. | DOI | MR
and ,[6] A uniformly accurate multiscale time integrator spectral method for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system in the high-plasma-frequency limit regime. J. Comput. Phys. 327 (2016) 270–293. | DOI | MR
and ,[7] A uniformly accurate multiscale time integrator pseudospectral method for the Klein-Gordon equation in the nonrelativistic limit regime. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52 (2014) 2488–2511. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[8] Uniformly accurate oscillatory integrators for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system from low to high-plasma frequency regimes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 57 (2019) 429–457. | DOI | MR
and ,[9] Uniformly accurate exponential-type integrators for Klein-Gordon equations with asymptotic convergence to the classical NLS splitting. Math. Comput. 87 (2018) 1227–1254. | DOI | MR
, and ,[10] Long time dynamics of Schrödinger and wave equations on flat tori. J. Differ. Equ. 267 (2019) 1167–1200. | DOI | MR
and ,[11] Order estimates in time of splitting methods for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2002) 26–40. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[12] Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear evolution equations. I. Schrödinger equations. Geom. Funct. Anal. 3 (1993) 107–156. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[13] Exponential sums and nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Geom. Funct. Anal. 3 (1993) 157–178. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[14] Global Solutions of Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations. In Vol. 46 of Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1999). | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[15] Growth of Sobolev norms in linear Schrödinger operators with quasi-periodic potential. Commun. Math. Phys. 204 (1999) 207–247. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[16] Closing the gap between trigonometric integrators and splitting methods for highly oscillatory differential equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2017) 57–74. | DOI | MR
, , , and ,[17] Nonlinear Schrodinger equation with time dependent potential. Commun. Math. Sci. 9 (2011) 937–964. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[18] On Fourier time splitting methods for NLS equations in the semi-classical limit II. Analytic regularity. Numer. Math. 136 (2017) 315–342. | DOI | MR
and ,[19] Uniformly accurate numerical schemes for highly oscillatory Klein-Gordon and nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Numer. Math. 129 (2015) 211–250. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[20] Solving highly-oscillatory NLS with SAM: numerical efficiency and geometric properties. Disc. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 9 (2016) 1327–1349. | DOI | MR
, , and ,[21] Improved error estimates for splitting methods applied to highly-oscillatory nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Math. Comput. 85 (2016) 2863–2885. | DOI | MR
, , and ,[22] A new class of uniformly accurate numerical schemes for highly oscillatory evolution equations. Found. Comput. Math. 20 (2020) 1–33. | DOI | MR
, , and ,[23] Multiscale Particle-In-Cell methods and comparisons for long time two-dimensional Vlasov-Poisson equation with strong magnetic field. Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 136–151. | DOI | MR
, and ,[24] Uniformly accurate Particle-in-Cell method for the long time two-dimensional Vlasov-Poisson equation with uniform strong magnetic field. J. Comput. Phys. 346 (2017) 172–190. | DOI | MR
, , and ,[25] On growth of Sobolev norms in linear Schrödinger equations with time dependent Gevrey potential. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 24 (2012) 151–180. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[26] Geometric Numerical Integration and Schrödinger Equations. European Mathematical Society (2012). | MR | Zbl
,[27] Convergence of a split-step Hermite method for the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 31 (2011) 396–415. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[28] Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin (2006). | MR | Zbl
, and ,[29] Global well-posedness of the energy critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation with small initial data in H1(𝕋3). Duke Math. J. 159 (2011) 329–349. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[30] The energy-critical defocusing NLS on (𝕋3). Duke Math. J. 161 (2012) 1581–1612. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[31] Solving Schrödinger equation in semiclassical regime with highly oscillatory time-dependent potentials. J. Comput. Phys. 376 (2019) 564–584. | DOI | MR
, and ,[32] On splitting methods for Schrödinger-Poisson and cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Math. Comput. 77 (2008) 2141–2153. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[33] A uniformly and optimally accurate multiscale time integrator method for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system in the subsonic limit regime. Comput. Math. Appl. 76 (2018) 602–619. | DOI | MR
and ,[34] From the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Hyperbol. Differ. Equ. 2 (2005) 975–1008. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[35] On the rotating nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation: non-relativistic limit and numerical methods. Preprint hal-01956352 (2018). | MR
, and ,[36] Spectral Methods: Algorithms, Analysis and Applications, Springer, Berlin (2011). | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[37] Error analysis of the Strang time-splitting Laguerre–Hermite/Hermite collocation methods for the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. Found. Comput. Math. 13 (2013) 99–137. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[38] Convergence analysis of high-order time-splitting pseudo-spectral methods for nonlinear Schrödinger equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50 (2012) 3231–3258. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[39] Logarithmic bounds on Sobolev norms for time dependent linear Schrödinger equations. Commun. Part. Differ. Equ. 33 (2008) 2164–2179. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[40] Symmetric high order Gautschi-type exponential wave integrators pseudospectral method for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation in the nonrelativistic limit regime. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 15 (2017) 405–427. | MR
and ,[41] Split-step methods for the solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23 (1986) 485–507. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[42] Relativistic superfluidity and vorticity from the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 125019. | DOI
, , , and ,[43] Construction of higher order symplectic integrators. Phys. Lett. A 150 (1990) 262–268. | DOI | MR
,[44] On error estimates of an exponential wave integrator sine pseudospectral method for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 32 (2016) 266–291. | DOI | MR
,Cité par Sources :