Modeling and stabilization of current-controlled piezo-electric beams with dynamic electromagnetic field
ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, Tome 26 (2020), article no. 8.

Piezoelectric materials can be controlled with current (or charge) as the electrical input, instead of voltage. The main purpose of this paper is to derive the governing equations for a current-controlled piezo-electric beam and to investigate stabilizability. The magnetic permeability in piezo-electric materials is generally neglected in models. However, it has a significant qualitative effect on properties of the control system such as stabilizability. Besides the consideration of current control, there are several new aspects to the model. Most importantly, a fully dynamic magnetic model is included. Also, electrical potential and magnetic vector potential are chosen to be quadratic-through thickness to include the induced effects of the electromagnetic field. Hamilton’s principle is used to derive a boundary value problem that models a single piezo-electric beam actuated by a current (or charge) source at the electrodes. Two sets of decoupled system of partial differential equations are obtained; one for stretching of the beam and another one for bending motion. Since current (or charge) controller only affects the stretching motion, attention is focused on control of the stretching equations in this paper. It is shown that the Lagrangian of the beam is invariant under certain transformations. A Coulomb type gauge condition is used. This gauge condition decouples the electrical potential equation from the equations of the magnetic potential. A semigroup approach is used to prove that the Cauchy problem is well-posed. Unlike voltage actuation, a bounded control operator in the natural energy space is obtained. The paper concludes with analysis of stabilizability and comparison with other actuation approaches and models.

Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/cocv/2019004
Classification : 74F15, 93D15, 35Q60
Mots-clés : Piezoelectric, charge actuation, current actuation, stabilization, control, partial differential equations, distributed parameter system, induced voltage, electromotive force
@article{COCV_2020__26_1_A8_0,
     author = {\"Ozer, Ahmet \"Ozkan and Morris, Kirsten A.},
     title = {Modeling and stabilization of current-controlled piezo-electric beams with dynamic electromagnetic field},
     journal = {ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {26},
     year = {2020},
     doi = {10.1051/cocv/2019004},
     mrnumber = {4062452},
     zbl = {1434.74055},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019004/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Özer, Ahmet Özkan
AU  - Morris, Kirsten A.
TI  - Modeling and stabilization of current-controlled piezo-electric beams with dynamic electromagnetic field
JO  - ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations
PY  - 2020
VL  - 26
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019004/
DO  - 10.1051/cocv/2019004
LA  - en
ID  - COCV_2020__26_1_A8_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Özer, Ahmet Özkan
%A Morris, Kirsten A.
%T Modeling and stabilization of current-controlled piezo-electric beams with dynamic electromagnetic field
%J ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations
%D 2020
%V 26
%I EDP-Sciences
%U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019004/
%R 10.1051/cocv/2019004
%G en
%F COCV_2020__26_1_A8_0
Özer, Ahmet Özkan; Morris, Kirsten A. Modeling and stabilization of current-controlled piezo-electric beams with dynamic electromagnetic field. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, Tome 26 (2020), article no. 8. doi : 10.1051/cocv/2019004. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2019004/

[1] C.D. Benchimol, A note on weak stabilizability of contraction semigroups. SIAM J. Control Optim. 16 (1978) 373–379 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[2] Y. Cao and X.B. Chen, A survey of modeling and control Issues for piezo-electric actuators. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Cont. 137 (2014) 014001 | DOI

[3] C.Y.K. Chee, L. Tong and G.P. Steven, A review on the modelling of piezo-electric sensors and actuators incorporated in intelligent structures. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 9 (1998) 3–19 | DOI

[4] G. Chen, A note on the boundary stabilization of the wave equation. SIAM J. Control Optim. 19 (1981) 106–113 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] R. Comstock, Charge control of piezo-electric actuators to reduce hysteresis effects. United States Patent # 4, 263, 527, Assignee: The Charles Stark Draper Labrotary (1981)

[6] R.F. Curtain and H.J. Zwart, An Introduction to Infinite-Dimensional Linear Systems Theory. Springer, Berlin (1995) | MR | Zbl

[7] R. Dautray and J.-L. Lions, Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology. Vol. 1 of Physical Origins and Classical Methods. Springer, Berlin (1988) | MR | Zbl

[8] Ph. Destuynder, I. Legrain, L. Castel and N. Richard, Theoretical, numerical and experimental discussion of the use of piezo-electric devices for control–structure interaction. Eur. J. Mech. A Solids 11 (1992) 181–213 | MR

[9] G. Duvaut and J.L. Lions, Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics. Springer, Berlin (1976) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[10] A.C. Eringen and G.A. Maugin, Electrodynamics of Continua I. Foundations and Solid Media. Springer-Verlag, New York (1990) | DOI | MR

[11] A.J. Fleming and S.O.R. Moheimani, Precision current and charge amplifiers for driving highly capacitive piezo-electric loads. Electr. Lett. 39 (2003) 282–284 | DOI

[12] Fur K. Furutani, M. Urushibata and N. Mohri, Displacement control of piezo-electric element by feedback of induced charge. Nanotechnology 9 (1998) 93–98 | DOI

[13] K. Ghandi and N.W. Hagood, A hybrid finite element model for phase transitions in nonlinear electro-mechanically coupled material. Proc. SPIE 3039 (1997) 97–112 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[14] J.S. Gibson, A note on stabilization of infinite-dimensional linear oscillators by compact linear feedback. SIAM J. Control Optim. 18 (1980) 311–316 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[15] R.B. Gorbet, K.A. Morris and D.W.L. Wang, Passivity-based stability and control of hysteresis in smart actuators. IEEE Trans. Cont. Syst. Technol. 9 (2001) 5–16 | DOI

[16] N.W. Hagood, W.H. Chung and A.V. Flotov, Modeling of piezo-electric actuator dynamics for active structural control. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struc. 1 (1990) 327–354 | DOI

[17] S.W. Hansen, Analysis of a plate with a localized piezo-electric patch, in Proc. of Conference on Decision & Control, Tampa, Florida (1998) 2952–2957

[18] J.E. Lagnese and J.-L. Lions, Modeling Analysis and Control of Thin Plates. Masson, Paris (1988) | MR | Zbl

[19] P.C.Y. Lee, A variational principle for the equations of piezo-electromagnetism in elastic dielectric crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 691 (1991) 7470–7473 | DOI

[20] J.A. Main, E. Garcia and D.V. Newton, Precision position control of piezo-electric actuators using charge feedback. J. Guid. Cont. Dyn. 18 (1995) 1068–1073 | DOI | Zbl

[21] J.A. Main and E. Garcia, Design impact of piezo-electric actuator nonlinearities. J. Guid. Cont. Dyn. 20 (1997) 327–332 | DOI

[22] K.A. Morris and A.Ö. Özer, Modeling and stabilizability of voltage-actuated piezo-electric beams with magnetic effects. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52 (2014) 2371–2398 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[23] K.A. Morris and A.Ö. Özer, Comparison of stabilization of current-actuated and voltage-actuated piezo-electric beams, in 53rd Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Decision & Control, Los Angeles, California, USA (2014) 571–576 | DOI

[24] C. Newcomb and I. Flinn, Improving the linearity of piezo-electric ceramic actuators. Electr. Lett. 18 (1982) 442–443 | DOI

[25] A.Ö. Özer, Further stabilization and exact observability results for voltage-actuated piezo-electric beams with magnetic effects. Math. Cont. Signals Syst. 27 (2015) 219–244 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[26] A.Ö. Özer, Modeling and stabilization results for a charge or current-actuated active constrained layer (ACL) beam model with the electrostatic assumption, in Proc. SPIE 9799 Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2016) 9799F

[27] A.Ö. Özer, Modeling and controlling an active constrained layered (ACL) beam actuated by two voltage sources with/without magnetic effects. IEEE Trans. Autom. Cont. 62 (2017) 6445–6450 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[28] A.Ö. Özer, Potential formulation for charge or current-controlled piezoelectric smart composites and stabilization results: electrostatic vs. quasi-static vs. fully-dynamic approaches. IEEE Trans. Autom. Cont. 64(3) (2018) 989–1002 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[29] A. Pazy, Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations. Springer-Verlag, New York (1983) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[30] A.J.A Ramos, C.S.L. Gonçalves and S.S.C. Neto, Exponential stability and numerical treatment for piezoelectric beams with magnetic effect. ESAIM: M2AN 52 (2018) 255–274 | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl

[31] N. Rogacheva, The Theory of Piezoelectric Shells and Plates. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1994)

[32] S.J. Rupitsch, Piezoelectric Sensors and Actuators. Springer, Berlin (2018)

[33] R.C. Smith, Smart Material Systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, PA (2005) | DOI | MR | Zbl

[34] R.C. Smith, C. Bouton and R. Zrostlik, Partial and full inverse compensation for hysteresis in smart material systems, in Proc. American Control Conference (2000) 2750–2754

[35] R. Stanway, J.A. Rongong and N.D. Sims, Active constrained-layer damping: a state-of-the-art review. Autom. Cont. Syst. 217 (2003) 437–456

[36] H.F. Tiersten, Linear Piezoelectric Plate Vibrations. Plenum Press, N ew York (1969)

[37] S. Tumanski, Induction coil sensors – a review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 18 (2007) R31–R46 | DOI

[38] H.S. Tzou, Piezoelectric shells, Solid Mechanics and Its applications 19. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands (1993) | DOI

[39] J. Yang, A review of a few topics in piezo-electricity. Appl. Mech. Rev. 59 (2006) 335–345 | DOI

Cité par Sources :

The financial support of the Western Kentucky University (AOO) and the NSERC Discovery Grant Program (KM) for this research is gratefully acknowledged.