We propose a general control framework for two-phase flows with variable densities in the diffuse interface formulation, where the distribution of the fluid components is described by a phase field. The flow is governed by the diffuse interface model proposed in Abels et al. [M3AS 22 (2012) 1150013]. On the basis of the stable time discretization proposed in Garcke et al. [Appl. Numer. Math. 99 (2016) 151] we derive necessary optimality conditions for the time-discrete and the fully discrete optimal control problem. We present numerical examples with distributed and boundary controls, and also consider the case, where the initial value of the phase field serves as control variable.
Accepté le :
DOI : 10.1051/cocv/2018006
Mots-clés : Optimal control, boundary control, initial value control, two-phase flow, Cahn–Hilliard, Navier–Stokes, diffuse-interface models
@article{COCV_2019__25__A13_0, author = {Garcke, Harald and Hinze, Michael and Kahle, Christian}, title = {Optimal control of time-discrete two-phase flow driven by a diffuse-interface model}, journal = {ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations}, publisher = {EDP-Sciences}, volume = {25}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1051/cocv/2018006}, zbl = {1437.35575}, mrnumber = {3963528}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2018006/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Garcke, Harald AU - Hinze, Michael AU - Kahle, Christian TI - Optimal control of time-discrete two-phase flow driven by a diffuse-interface model JO - ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations PY - 2019 VL - 25 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2018006/ DO - 10.1051/cocv/2018006 LA - en ID - COCV_2019__25__A13_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Garcke, Harald %A Hinze, Michael %A Kahle, Christian %T Optimal control of time-discrete two-phase flow driven by a diffuse-interface model %J ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations %D 2019 %V 25 %I EDP-Sciences %U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2018006/ %R 10.1051/cocv/2018006 %G en %F COCV_2019__25__A13_0
Garcke, Harald; Hinze, Michael; Kahle, Christian. Optimal control of time-discrete two-phase flow driven by a diffuse-interface model. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, Tome 25 (2019), article no. 13. doi : 10.1051/cocv/2018006. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/cocv/2018006/
[1] Weak solutions for a non-Newtonian diffuse interface model with different densities. Nonlinearity 29 (2016) 3426–3453. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[2] Thermodynamically consistent, frame indifferent diffuse interface models for incompressible two-phase flows with different densities. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22 (2012) 1150013. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[3] Existence of weak solutions for a diffuse interface model for two-phase flows of incompressible fluids with different densities. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 15 (2013) 453–480. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[4] On an incompressible Navier–Stokes/Cahn–Hilliard system with degenerate mobility. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré (C) Non Lin. Anal. 30 (2013) 1175–1190. | DOI | Numdam | MR | Zbl
, and ,[5] Sobolev Spaces, 2nd edn. Vol. 140 of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Elsevier (2003). | MR | Zbl
and ,[6] Time integration for diffuse interface models for two-phase flow. J. Comput. Phys. 262 (2014) 58–71. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[7] Linear Functional Analysis. Springer (2016). | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[8] A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 23 (2001) 15–41. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[9] PETSc. Available at http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc (2014).
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and ,[10] Control of interface evolution in multiphase fluid flows. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52 (2014) 2284–2318. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[11] Finite element approximation of a phase field model for surface diffusion of voids in a stressed solid. Math. Comput. 75 (2005) 7–41. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[12] Numerical solution of a flow-control problem: vorticity reduction by dynamic boundary action. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19 (1998) 829–860. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[13] DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. J. Fluid Mech. 447 (2001) 179–225. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[14] An extension of the projected gradient method to a Banach space setting with application in structural topology optimization. SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 (2017) 1481–1499. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[15] The Cahn–Hilliard gradient theory for phase separation with non-smooth free energy: Part I. Mathematical analysis. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 2 (1991) 233–280. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[16] The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Vol. 15 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer (2008). | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[17] Edge residuals dominate a posteriori error estimates for low order finite element methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 36 (1999) 1571–1587. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[18] Stability Estimates of Discontinuous Galerkin Time-Stepping Schemes for the Allen–Cahn Equation and Applications to Optimal Control. Preprint (2016). | arXiv
,[19] A convergent adaptive algorithm for Poisson’s equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33 (1996) 1106–1124. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[20] Numerical analysis of the Allen–Cahn equation and approximation for mean curvature flows. Numer. Math. 94 (2003) 33–65. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[21] Boundary value problems and optimal boundary control for the Navier–Stokes system: the two-dimensional case. SIAM J. Control Optim. 36 (1998) 852–894. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[22] A stable and linear time discretization for a thermodynamically consistent model for two-phase incompressible flow. Appl. Numer. Math. 99 (2016) 151–171. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[23] The Neumann problem and Helmholtz decomposition in convex domains. J. Funct. Anal. 259 (2010) 2147–2164 | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[24] Finite Element Methods for Navier–Stokes Equations, Vol. 5 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer (1986). | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[25] On convergent schemes for diffuse interface models for two-phase flow of incompressible fluids with general mass densities. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 (2013) 3036–3061. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[26] Two-phase flow with mass density contrast: stable schemes for a thermodynamic consistent and frame indifferent diffuse interface model. J. Comput. Phys. 257(A) (2014) 708–725. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[27] On fully decoupled convergent schemes for diffuse interface models for two-phase flow with general mass densities. Commun. Comput. Phys. 19 (2016) 1473–1502. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[28] Splitting schemes for a Navier–Stokes–Cahn–Hilliard model for two fluids with different densities. J. Comput. Math. 32 (2014) 643–664. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[29] The velocity tracking problem for Navier–Stokes flows with boundary control. SIAM J. Control Optim. 39 (2000) 594–634. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[30] A numerical method for the quasi-incompressible Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes equations for variable density flows with a discrete energy law. J. Comput. Phys. 276 (2014) 486–507. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[31] GSL–GNU Scientific Library, v1.16. Available at http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/ (2013).
[32] Distributed optimal control of the Cahn–Hilliard system including the case of a double-obstacle homogeneous free energy density. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012) 388–418. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[33] Optimal control of a semidiscrete Cahn–Hilliard Navier–Stokes system. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52 (2014) 747–772. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[34] An adaptive finite element Moreau–Yosida-based solver for a non-smooth Cahn–Hilliard problem. Optim. Methods Softw. 25 (2011) 777–811. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[35] A goal-oriented dual-weighted adaptive finite element approach for the optimal control of a nonsmooth Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system. Hamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik 2016-25 (2016). | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[36] Optimal control of a semidiscrete Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system with nonmatched fluid densities. SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 (2017) 1954–1989. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[37] A variational discretization concept in control constrained optimization: the linear quadratic case. Comput.Optim. Appl. 30 (2005) 45–61. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[38] Instantaneous closed loop control of the Navier–Stokes system. SIAM J. Control Optim. 44 (2005) 564–583. | DOI | MR | Zbl
,[39] Model predictive control of variable density multiphase flows governed by diffuse interface models, in Vol. 1 of Proceedings of the first IFAC Workshop on Control of Systems Modeled by Partial Differential Equations (2013) 127–132.
and ,[40] Second order methods for boundary control of the instationary Navier–Stokes system. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 84 (2004) 171–187. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[41] Optimization with PDE constraints, Vol. 23 of Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications. Springer (2009). | MR | Zbl
, , and ,[42] Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics. Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 60 (2009) 1259–1288. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, , , , , et al.,[43] Instantaneous control of two-phase flow with different densities. Oberwolfach Reports. In Vol. 10 of Chapter: Interfaces and Free Boundaries: Analysis, Control and Simulation (2013) 898–901.
,[44] Simulation and Control of Two-Phase Flow Using Diffuse-Interface Models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hamburg (2014).
,[45] An L∞ bound for the Cahn–Hilliard equation with relaxed non-smooth free energy density. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 14 (2017) 243–254. | MR | Zbl
,[46] Finite element approximation of a Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system. Interfaces Free Bound. 10 (2008) 15–43. | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and ,[47] Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method – The FEniCS Book, Vol. 84 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. Springer (2012). | DOI | MR | Zbl
, and , editors.[48] Finite element approximation of a phase field model arising in nanostructure patterning. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 31 (2015) 1890–1924. | DOI | MR | Zbl
and ,[49] Study of phase-separation dynamics by use of cell dynamical systems. I. Modeling. Phys. Rev. A 38 (1988) 434–463. | DOI
and ,[50] Design of adaptive finite element software: the finite element toolbox ALBERTA, Vol. 42 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. Springer (2005). | MR | Zbl
and ,[51] Navier–Stokes Equations – Theory and Numerical Analysis. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford (1977). | MR | Zbl
,Cité par Sources :